Bitmern Solo
Bitmern Solo
Log inStart Mining
← Back to blog

Solo Mining vs Pool Mining: Which Pays You Better?

Shared pools pay steady fractions. Solo keeps ~99% of blocks you find. Here’s how to choose - and how Bitmern Solo works.

9 min read
Solo Mining vs Pool Mining: Which Pays You Better?

ASIC owners eventually face the same payout question: do you want small, regular shares of someone else's luck, or nearly the full block when your own hashrate finds one?

In a shared pool, miners combine hashrate and split rewards (frequent, small). In solo you keep nearly the entire block when you find one (higher variance). Bitmern Solo adds stratum, monitoring, and alerts at a flat 1% - you keep 99%.

That distinction drives everything else: fee structure, cash-flow rhythm, and who each model fits. This guide compares shared pool mining and solo mining without inventing hashrates, difficulty figures, or luck odds. It also explains what a "solo mining pool" actually is, how Bitmern Solo works, and when staying on a shared pool is still the better call.

What shared pool mining is

In a shared mining pool, many miners point their ASICs (or other hardware) at one operator. The pool's combined hashrate finds blocks more often than any single miner would alone. When a block is found, the reward is split among participants according to the pool's payout scheme - typically based on shares submitted over a window of time.

What you receive is usually a fraction of the coinbase (and any included fees), minus the pool's fee. Payouts arrive often enough that many miners treat them like a steady operational income stream. You rarely "win" a whole block yourself; you win tiny slices of many blocks the pool finds as a group.

Shared pools exist because mining is probabilistic. Finding a valid block depends on hashrate relative to network difficulty. Alone, a small or mid-size farm can go a long time without a find. Combined, the group hits blocks regularly, and accounting systems turn that into predictable fractional payouts.

Typical shared-pool economics, as framed on Bitmern Solo's own pricing comparison, sit in a 2-3% fee band. Exact competitor fees vary and are not listed here. What matters for the comparison is the model: you trade upside (full block ownership) for certainty (frequent fractional rewards).

What solo mining is

Solo mining means your hashrate works toward finding a block that pays you, not a proportional share of a group's finds. When your setup solves a block, you keep nearly the entire reward (minus whatever flat fee your infrastructure provider charges, if any). Between finds, you may receive nothing from that coin's mining.

That is the core tradeoff. Solo does not change the mathematics of how often blocks appear on the network. It changes who owns the reward when your work finds one. Variance goes up; per-block take-home goes up as well, because you are not diluting the reward across thousands of other miners.

Solo is not the same as "no software and no servers." Historically, true solo meant running your own node, stratum, and monitoring stack. Many ASIC owners do not want that operational burden. That gap is exactly why solo pools (shared infrastructure, finder-takes-reward) exist - covered later in this article.

Tradeoff table: certainty, upside, fees, and fit

Dimension Shared pool Solo (incl. solo pool infra) Certainty of payout cadence Higher: frequent fractional payouts Lower: payouts when you find a block Upside per found block Fractional share of pool finds ~99% of the block you find (at Bitmern Solo's flat 1%) Fee model Often in the 2-3% band for typical shared pools Flat 1% on Bitmern Solo; no shared payout split Variance Smoothed by group hashrate High; dry spells and jackpots both possible Who it fits Operators who need predictable cash flow Operators who can absorb variance and want max take-home on finds Infrastructure Pool runs stratum, accounting, payouts You can self-host, or use a solo pool for stratum + monitoring

Read the table as preference, not a promise of which model "pays more" in a given week. Over short windows, luck dominates. Over long windows, fee percentage and whether you keep the full block or a share of many blocks both matter - but only alongside your hashrate, coin choice, and ability to wait.

What a "solo mining pool" actually means

The phrase "solo pool" confuses people because "pool" usually means shared rewards. A solo mining pool is different.

Shared infrastructure, not shared payouts. A solo pool gives many miners access to the same stratum endpoints, monitoring dashboards, VarDiff ports, and alert systems. When a block is found, the reward goes to the miner whose hashrate found it - not proportionally to everyone who was connected that day.

You are not buying a slice of the group's luck. You are renting (or sharing) the plumbing that makes solo mining practical: connection stability, DDoS protection, real-time stats, and wallet payouts - without building Miningcore and ops tooling yourself.

That is why solo ≠ no infrastructure. Running your own node and stratum is valid solo mining. Pointing at a solo pool is also solo mining in the reward sense. The difference is operational: who maintains the stratum, monitors workers, and wires email alerts when a machine goes offline.

If a service splits every block among all connected miners by share contribution, it is a shared pool - regardless of branding. If it keeps rewards with the finder and charges a flat fee on that reward, it is solo infrastructure.

How Bitmern Solo fits

Bitmern Solo is built around that second model. The product tagline is straightforward: 10 supported coins. 1% pool fee.

Fee and reward

  • Flat 1% pool fee
  • You keep 99% of every block reward you find
  • No shared payouts - rewards are not diluted across other miners on the platform

Illustrative BTC example from Bitmern Solo's site (label: illustrative, not a projection of your earnings): for a 3.125 BTC block reward, the fee is 0.031 BTC, so you receive 3.094 BTC.

Compared with typical shared pools in the 2-3% fee band, the headline fee is lower - and more importantly, the payout model is different. You are not trading a slightly lower fee for the same fractional scheme. You are choosing full-block economics with a flat cut.

Supported coins

Bitmern Solo lists ten coins:

BTC, LTC, DOGE, BCH, DGB, XEC, ETC, ZEC, XMR, RVN

That mix covers Bitcoin and several SHA-256, Scrypt, and other algorithm families commonly mined with ASICs or dedicated hardware. Coin availability lets you point existing fleets without inventing a separate stack per chain - subject to your hardware and the coin's algorithm requirements.

Features included with an account

Included free with an account (per Bitmern Solo's product facts):

  • Real-time monitoring - hashrate, workers, shares, effort
  • Email alerts - offline workers, hashrate drops, payouts
  • VarDiff ports - difficulty adjusted for stable share submission
  • Direct wallet payouts - rewards go to your wallet
  • Calculator and earnings history
  • Miningcore under the hood, with DDoS protection

Connecting is kept high-level here on purpose: use the documentation and live site for current stratum details and defaults. Port choices and coin-specific setup change over time; the product surface (monitoring, alerts, VarDiff, wallet payouts) is what defines day-to-day operation.

What you are buying (and not buying)

You are buying stratum access, observability, and a flat fee on blocks you find. You are not buying smoothed, proportional income. Bitmern Solo does not turn solo variance into shared-pool certainty. It removes the need to self-host the stack while preserving solo economics.

Who should stay on shared pools (honest take)

Solo is not always the right answer. Stay on a shared pool if several of these apply:

  1. You need predictable cash flow. Payroll, hosting invoices, and power bills do not wait for your next block. Fractional payouts make budgeting easier.
  2. Your hashrate is small relative to the coin you mine. Absolute odds are not listed here - inventing expected time-to-block would be dishonest - but the principle is clear: less hashrate means longer typical gaps between solo finds. Shared pools convert that into frequent micro-payouts instead.
  3. You are still learning operations. Shared pools still require monitoring, but the psychological load of long dry spells is lower when something hits the wallet regularly.
  4. You prefer simplicity over upside. Some operators would rather optimize fleet efficiency and power than optimize take-home on rare finds. That preference is valid.
  5. You cannot tolerate variance emotionally or financially. High variance is not a temporary bug of solo mining; it is the product. If a multi-week quiet stretch would force bad decisions (panic selling hardware, skipping maintenance), shared pools are the safer operational fit.

None of that means shared pools are "better" in abstract. It means certainty has a price: higher typical fee bands and fractional ownership of every block the group finds. Solo flips that: lower flat fee on Bitmern Solo, near-full ownership when you hit, and silence when you do not.

A hybrid approach is also common among larger farms: keep base load on shared pools for cash flow, and point a portion of hashrate at solo infrastructure when you can absorb variance. This article does not prescribe ratios - those depend on your books, not a blog template.

How to choose without fake math

Decision frameworks that invent difficulty, luck percentages, or "expected blocks per month" for a generic reader are marketing, not advice. What you can decide from first principles:

  • Cash-flow need vs. upside preference. If wallet regularity matters more than max take-home on a find, shared wins. If you can float costs and want 99% of your own blocks, solo fits.
  • Fee drag over time. A flat 1% on full blocks versus a 2-3% band on fractional shares is not an apples-to-apples APR comparison, but fee percentage still compounds against you whenever rewards land.
  • Ops capacity. Self-hosted solo demands node and stratum discipline. A solo pool like Bitmern Solo trades a flat fee for that ops surface.
  • Coin and hardware match. Confirm your ASICs (or other miners) support one of the listed coins before switching payout models.

When you are ready to compare the product surface directly - monitoring, alerts, coin list, and fee - start from the source rather than third-party summaries.

Soft next step

Shared pools remain the right call if you need predictable cash flow. If you can absorb variance and want nearly the full block when your hashrate finds one, Bitmern Solo fits: 10 coins, flat 1% fee, keep 99%, with stratum, monitoring, and alerts included.

Start mining solo

Point your ASIC at Bitmern Solo and keep 99% of every block you find.

Start Mining → https://www.bitmernsolo.com/


This article compares payout models for educational purposes. Mining involves financial and operational risk, including periods with no rewards under solo setups. Always verify current fees, coin support, and connection details on bitmernsolo.com before pointing hardware.

Related posts